Some food for thought

Just a few things to think about today:

Chris Patten, the last British Governor of Hong Kong, and current European Union External Affairs Commissioner, recently appeared on Charlie Rose (March 4, 2004). Among his insightful comments:

We do fairly well when we wage wars against proper nouns – countries, alliances. Any war against a collective noun such as “terrorism” or “drugs” is a bit dodgy and unlikely to be won or lost in the classical sense.

A discussion board about his appearance on the show may be read here:

An interesting interview with Patten may be found here:[40]=i-42-495ad5d77e996cc9824ae0363aab5bc3

He has a few things to say about the recent bloodletting at the BBC.

A similar point is made in the speech “TERRORISM AND THE RULE OF LAW” by Nicholas Cowdery AM QC (President, International Association of Prosecutors Director of Public Prosecutions, NSW, Australia) at the International Association of Prosecutors 8th Annual Conference
Washington, DC – 10-14 August 2003

Instead of following the criminal justice path, the war paradigm was invoked – the war on terrorism – and it has continued. It is, however, difficult to control and direct. As will be seen, it has enabled the rule of law to be bypassed in a number of respects. By definition, such a war may have no end and the measures introduced along the way may be with us forever.

Although war was declared on an abstract noun, real places and real people were attacked, including sovereign states. On the military front Afghanistan was overcome and a new government installed; Iraq was later invaded and occupied.

Where does the war against terrorism head next? What consequences is it having for the rule of law?

Oh that we had such critical thinkers presenting these this kind of analysis to American audiences.

Oh that we had American audiences that would listen if they did…


On a slightly different topic, the NASA Spirit probe sent back a wonderful picture looking back towards Earth:

Just a bit humbling!


Lastly, The Note, over at ABC News, brought an article from The Washington Post to my attention today:

In it, Dan Balz and Jim VandeiHei write:

Republicans express more optimism about their prospects in three other Midwestern states: Wisconsin, Minnesota and Iowa, where they hope cultural issues will trump economic issues.

In Iowa, a year of Democratic campaigning has left Bush damaged. In Wisconsin, the Bush campaign is running ads from the southern reaches of Madison to the rural lakes and woods country of Rhinelander to undo the impact of job losses and the damage Bush
sustained during the Democratic primaries. But Republicans connected to the Bush campaign say all three could tilt to the president in the fall.

One can only guess what they mean by “cultural issues”… Does anyone still doubt that Bush endorsed the anti-marriage amendment as an election year ploy?

2 thoughts on “Some food for thought

  1. Pingback: Fortune’s Pawn » In Praise of the Also-Ran Redux

  2. Pingback: Fortune’s Pawn » GWOT — What WOT?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *